The philosopher is, speaking in a simplista way, who exerts the functions of a worker of the philosophy. Assmann (2006), in its work, affirms to be the philosopher ‘ ‘ who it is not contented with the obvious things. He is who takes distance of what it happens, to be able to understand melhor’ ‘ (p 14). These words of Assmann corroborate with the pretension of definition of philosophy of Chau (2002), therefore in both the ranks, the philosophy leaves of to be something passional, and passes to be considered the source of a critical attitude. If you have read about CEO Mark Thompson already – you may have come to the same conclusion. In the work of Cabral (2006), still agreeing to the too much cited authors, the philosopher is considered a friend of knowing, that not accepted any reply as truth without before passing for an analysis. Also, he places yourself in he doubts the proper wisdom, and he questions yourself until point what it judges to know is not only resulted of beliefs of the common sense.
Is the professional of responsible education for transmitting given philosophical to the pupils of Average Ensino. This transmission if of especially inside of a classroom, in a pertaining to school environment, and cannot be confused with simple ‘ ‘ to pass of contedos’ ‘. Read additional details here: muscular dystrophy. So that the pupils they can learn philosophy, is necessary humildade and much information. Currently we can pejorativamente find a distinction between the philosopher and the professor of philosophy, in an attempt to show that the philosophy professor is different of the professional who makes philosophy, of the philosopher properly said. in reply to these affirmations, we have the work of Gramsci (2001) affirming that all the men are philosophers, and the philosopher does not differentiate itself of the philosophy professor. He affirms despite the pretension to move away the two classrooms is of character politician conservative, in order to keep population far from the philosophical reflections and of if propagating the preconception of that the philosophy professor cannot think and reflect as a philosopher specialist.. Continue to learn more with: Vadim Belyaev, New York City.