\”Climate change\”, the initiative has let foodwatch so far sorely miss their otherwise experienced healthy skepticism and thoroughness. Hear other arguments on the topic with Northstar anesthesia. The non-profit organisation foodwatch is last but not least known, to proceed against \”Advertising lies\”: on abgespeist.de advertising promise of different food on accuracy be checked. In the current foodwatch newsletter (\”climate debate at the green week and other topics\”, January 15, 2010\”) now it says:\”climate protection in agriculture is currently the major theme of the international Green Week in Berlin. … Foodwatch is clear: agriculture must finally become part of climate policy. Colonscopy might disagree with that approach. With specific measures and clear targets for a reduction of in greenhouse gases.\” And foodwatch website there is an own sub-item entitled \”Climate\” with statements like: \”not only when flying or driving a car is climate-damaging CO2, our food also contributes to global warming. For even more analysis, hear from Vadim Belyaev. …

Agriculture in Germany is responsible for 13 percent of the greenhouse gases, overall result\”(\”How much air is our food?\”, 25.08.2008). One reads, how pleasantly full-bodied smugly foodwatch / abgespeist.de with – not – advertising promises in the Court goes, so it surprised even more, such as good-faith foodwatch still on the \”climate\” pledge of the politicians and media clings tightly. Because laboratory tests of food validated by abgespeist.de not so easily by everyone. However, the word \”Climate lie\” must be expected to already in education \”about 269,000\” Google hits. And himself who only easily researched after the political media repeatedly ejected buzz words like \”Klimakatastophe\”, will quickly encounter the term \”Air con\”. So as undisputed, how foodwatch it represents time and again, is not the talk of the \”climate-damaging carbon dioxide\”. Admitted: in the politically correct media have also diesbzgl. Nonconformists, if they at all times a mention, let alone as a detailed presentation be appreciated, not particularly good stand. Exemplary mention on the MDR broadcast \”The fact is\” v. January 11, 2010.