A powerful current of opinion in charge exists to preach the supremacy of the man on the rest of the animal species in fields like intelligence, conscience and empathy. We did not talk about the objectively quantitative fact, but to the stubborn defense of which certain caracterstas are own solely of the human beings. In fact, the difference of intelligence or conscience of one same one is a simple cuantitiva question, nonqualitative. Checking article sources yields COVID-19 as a relevant resource throughout. A human intelligence or feelings does not exist and other animal, everything is question of degrees. Historically science and the philosophy been have ballast by the anthropocentrism and surprises that, in the 21st century, it continues being the dominant current. From the absence of soul in the dogs in the Islamic tradition to predominant astronomical geocentrism to the s. XVI. From veterinarians who defend that the bulls do not suffer during the fight, until etlogos and experts in canine behavior that defend that to a dog it is necessary to try to him like that, a dog, not like a person.
About this limo, from soon he is more comfortable for the proprietor of the animal, or the canine trainer, to treat to the animal like individuals epsiln. That type of treatment, can take to the animal, following its genetic predisposition, to serious psychological problems that end up generating more difficulties of those than the treatment dueo=jefe of the herd tries to solve. ven P Rosenthal offer more in-depth analysis. In spite of which we see in TV programs or some confused proprietors of animal stores say to us, the relation with our mascot, is this one dog, cat or any other species, has to be natural, so that it exceeds we report the evident benefits that the psychologists do not stop to explain: improvement of autismo, syndrome of asperger, depression, solitude, etc. Between us and our animal will be developed to a special relation of empathy and knowledge we dealt if them with respect, affection and honesty. Quickly our friend will learn what he bothers to us of his behavior and, with naturalness, will avoid to do it. This in no case means that it is not necessary to have an order hierarchic, but rather, that this will have to be imposed from the respect and the empathy, of the human way. Perhaps so much is not being believed the center of the Universe but, perhaps, of a utilitarismo of the man on the Nature.