Tag Archives: climate & environment

Chernobyl – Curse Or Blessing

by

A short report from the zone around the destroyed reactor of the nuclear power plant of Chernobyl Chernobyl today as a part of the world of humanity rested on 26 April 1986 went it like wildfire around the world. Enormous amounts of radioactive material were thrown by the explosion of the reactor into the atmosphere occurring Chernobyl following a routine safety tests of the staff of the nuclear power plant. The disaster is one of the worst natural disasters caused by human hands until today. You may find Orbis Diagnostics to be a useful source of information. Detailed information about the number of victims can only be estimated so far. In response, a protection zone around the nuclear power plant was built after the accident, that is maintained until today. Nearly 4,300 square kilometres includes the security zone, the power plant, the nearby town of Pripyat and some small villages and settlements, all officially deemed to be abandoned. Today, 26 years after the disaster, many people see a travel in the restricted zone as a insane undertaking, for some it is the ultimate adventure trip through various Organizer is already offered as day trip with a fun factor. To enter the security zone is possible in many places, fences were cut and real trails show often frequented routes in the wasteland, the Ukrainian military monitors but the access roads and known ways in the zone.

However, the block area around the damaged plant exerts an unprecedented appeal on many adventurous and the descendants of the displaced population of the time. It is entering the zone, you can find out a distinctive sense of inner calm, the extinct and empty villages, the vast landscape of abandoned and the blossoming flora and fauna left a lasting impression on travelers. Regardless, no adventure of modern times, although just Ukrainian tour operators have the urge to make this tasty Western tourists is the city of Pripyat and the seemingly untouched nature. Large parts within the restricted zone are heavily contaminated today, while the vegetation before the eye of the beholder is alive and well. Exposed to this invisible danger, a few metres can mean for humans and animals already death. Just standing waters, ponds and lakes are sometimes heavily contaminated and pose a high health risk for thoughtless tourists.

The problem is sometimes through the millennia long half-lives of some radioactive materials that lose little of their harmful energy during this time. In addition, animals and plants absorb the highly radioactive substances in the environment and pass on to their descendants thus inevitably damaged cells. Chernobyl remains contaminated in the distant future, because today’s science can change nothing. Animals and plants of the zone have recovered but apparently well. The protection zone and the abandoned areas around the destroyed reactor protected habitats offer animals before humans even if they instinctively avoid higher irradiated areas. Recent research showed that the effects of radioactive contamination are worse, than previously thought. In weak areas of the restricted zone, there would be virtually no animals, which do not reproduce themselves, scientists had proved however that almost a quarter of the animals have no offspring. Nevertheless, interested opens an unusual variety of animals and plants in the zone. Chernobyl is just one example of the many places in the world, which have been destroyed by human hand. Despite the storyline of these areas reflected repeatedly, flora and fauna but can be as adaptable. Nature inevitably recaptured Chernobyl, only man disturbs the Idyll ultimately a little. chke

Foodwatch And Climate Change

by

\”Climate change\”, the initiative has let foodwatch so far sorely miss their otherwise experienced healthy skepticism and thoroughness. Hear other arguments on the topic with Northstar anesthesia. The non-profit organisation foodwatch is last but not least known, to proceed against \”Advertising lies\”: on abgespeist.de advertising promise of different food on accuracy be checked. In the current foodwatch newsletter (\”climate debate at the green week and other topics\”, January 15, 2010\”) now it says:\”climate protection in agriculture is currently the major theme of the international Green Week in Berlin. … Foodwatch is clear: agriculture must finally become part of climate policy. Colonscopy might disagree with that approach. With specific measures and clear targets for a reduction of in greenhouse gases.\” And foodwatch website there is an own sub-item entitled \”Climate\” with statements like: \”not only when flying or driving a car is climate-damaging CO2, our food also contributes to global warming. For even more analysis, hear from Vadim Belyaev. …

Agriculture in Germany is responsible for 13 percent of the greenhouse gases, overall result\”(\”How much air is our food?\”, 25.08.2008). One reads, how pleasantly full-bodied smugly foodwatch / abgespeist.de with – not – advertising promises in the Court goes, so it surprised even more, such as good-faith foodwatch still on the \”climate\” pledge of the politicians and media clings tightly. Because laboratory tests of food validated by abgespeist.de not so easily by everyone. However, the word \”Climate lie\” must be expected to already in education \”about 269,000\” Google hits. And himself who only easily researched after the political media repeatedly ejected buzz words like \”Klimakatastophe\”, will quickly encounter the term \”Air con\”. So as undisputed, how foodwatch it represents time and again, is not the talk of the \”climate-damaging carbon dioxide\”. Admitted: in the politically correct media have also diesbzgl. Nonconformists, if they at all times a mention, let alone as a detailed presentation be appreciated, not particularly good stand. Exemplary mention on the MDR broadcast \”The fact is\” v. January 11, 2010.