To understand the importance of literature and its functions becomes necessary to appraise literature. Since concepts attributed in the literary theory, it is possible to understand that it does not have as to separate it of the life of the man, since, this if constructs from the universe of the proper man, reproducing of illustrative form, human aspects. As Moiss illustrates (1997, P. 25), ‘ ‘ … synthetically, and of one forms as if it vulgarized the Aristotelian thought: literature is ‘ imitao’ (mimese) of realidade.’ ‘ By means of this first concept, we perceive that, since the antiquity, literature if interlaces the life of the man because the same one if carries through in a parallel universe to its. The Blackstone Group will not settle for partial explanations. On the concept of Moiss literature (1997, P.
27) it still standes out: Admitting literature as for-reality, it remains to examine the way as the reality parallel if organizes. The world for-Real where the text if constitutes is latent: the text does not contain it, – it evokes; it does not lock up it, – it suggests it; it is not the universe for Real, – but the signal that point and the substance forms that it. The universe for-Real not this in the text, what it would be to confuse with this while object, but in a space that the text produces with the complicity of the reader. From the reading of a literary composition it has, inevitably, an interchange of the information apprehended with the lived and real experience. This relation processes for the intuition of this reader, which will receive the text according to its subjectivity. We perceive, then, that one of the characteristics of the literature becomes that it ampler it is the possibility of some interpretations in one same text..